Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÄÚÇÎ µÎ²²ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ µû¸¥ POM º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ º¯¿¬ÀûÇÕµµ ¿¬±¸

Comparison of the marginal fit of POM restorations with different thickness of metal copings

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2012³â 34±Ç 2È£ p.135 ~ 143
ÀÓÇüÅÃ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÓÇüÅà( Lim Hyung-Tek ) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°ú±â°ø½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal fit of POM restorations with 3 different
thickness of metal coping.

Methods: 2.0 Occlusal reduction, 1.0mm preparation of axial wall with 6degree taper, and chamfer margin was
prepared a maxillary first premolar on dentiform. Duplicate prepared die and, make 30 individual dies with Ni-Cr metal. Make 3 groups of 30 press ceramic on Metal crown with different thickness of metal coping; 10 of 0.1 , 10 of 0.3 , 10 of 0.5 thickness metal coping. The marginal fit of the crowns was evaluated 50 points per 1 crown, around the crown margin circumference under a optical microscope at original magnification 100. A 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare data.

Results: The mean marginal discrepancy for POM with 0.1 metal copings was 72.56 , 67.83 for 0.3 metal coping POMs, and 72.56 for 0.5mm metal coping POM. The 1-way ANOVA showed significant difference among 3 groups.

Conclusion: The marginal fit of pressed-on-metal (POMs) was best with 0.3 thickness of metal coping, fallowing by 0.1 , and 0.5 in the order.

Å°¿öµå

POM; lucite glass ceramic; marginal fit

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI